Reports

What are the best Australian share ETFs of 2025?

We road test 5 of the most popular Australian share ETFs, comparing them across 6 factors.

Australian share ETFs continue to gain in popularity and the Australian ETF market shows no signs of slowing down, despite market turbulence, so it’s more important than ever to make sure you are picking the best ETFs for your portfolio. 

2024 was the biggest year on record for the Australian exchange traded funds (ETF) industry, beating previous record highs from 2021. At the end of December 2024 and in the 12 months prior, Australian ETFs saw a record breaking $68.9B (38.8%) growth year-on-year.

Due to the popularity of our Australian ETF Report, we are road testing five popular Australian share ETFs, comparing them across six different factors, saving you the hassle when trying to work out what are the best Australian share ETFs to buy in 2025.

  1. Size
  2. Costs
  3. Slippage
  4. Liquidity
  5. Returns
  6. Track record
  7. Stockspot’s verdict

ETFs track a market index rather than taking bets on individual companies. For this reason, their management fees are much lower than typical active fund managers.  Tracking a market index also offers the benefits of transparency and potential tax efficiency. ETF investors directly benefit from share capital gains, dividends and franking credits paid by shares contained within an ETF.
See our ETF Performance Comparison Tables to see all categories.

The Best Australian Share ETFs for 2022 Review: STW, VAS, IOZ, MVW, A200

Size

ASX codeETF nameSize ($B)*
STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF5.4
VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF18.2
IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF6.4
MVWVanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF2.6
A200Betashares Australia 200 ETF6.8
Total fund assets under management as at 31 March 2025

VAS and A200 are the largest Australian share ETFs managing $18.2 billion and $6.8 billion respectively. A200 has overtaken IOZ as the second largest Australian share ETF, with IOZ now in third position, managing $6.4 billion.

MVW has been growing but is still considerably smaller than its peers managing $2.6 billion.

Size is important because ETFs must reach a certain size to become viable. 

As ETFs gather more assets, it becomes easier for them to cut their expense ratios (fees) to continue attracting more funds. 

On the other hand, ETFs which haven’t achieved critical mass can be forced to shut down and return investor funds or increase their fees to cover their costs.

Costs

ASX codeETF nameMER (% p.a.)
STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF0.05
VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF0.07
IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF0.05
MVWVanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF0.35
A200Betashares Australia 200 ETF0.04
Data as at 31 March 2025. Source: ASX

ETF expense ratios are becoming more competitive in Australia with the fee war expected to continue. 

These ETFs have been undercut by Betashares when they launched A200 at 0.07% p.a., which they then slashed to 0.04% in March 2023 to become the most competitively priced ETF.

This sent a strong signal from Betashares that it intends to compete with State Street, Vanguard and iShares in this category. Demonstrative of the price sensitivity, STW and IOZ have fees of 0.05%, while MVW remains uncompetitive with a fee of 0.35%.

VAS is the most profitable ETF, earning approximately $12.7 million in revenue per year given its large share of the Australian share ETF pie, more than enough to be sustainable.

On the other hand, the more recently launched A200 is earning around $2.7 million p.a. in fees based on its $6.8 billion AUM.

Read more here about how Stockspot takes the guesswork out of choosing ETFs and builds you a diversified portfolio online.

The 3 lowest cost ETFs are now within 0.01% p.a. of each other on fees, which is great news for investors, as costs are one of the only factors you can fully control when investing in Australian shares. The less you pay a fund, the more of the returns you keep in your pocket.

That said, costs have converged to the point where investors need to carefully consider other factors including the funds’ commercial viability, liquidity and track record.

Slippage

ASX codeETF name% Spread
STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF0.04
VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF0.03
IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF0.04
MVWVanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF0.06
A200Betashares Australia 200 ETF0.03
Data as at 31 March 2025. Source: ASX

Slippage refers to how much you lose by crossing the spread when buying or selling an ETF. It’s calculated by the average percentage difference between the best buyer and seller during market hours.

It has more of an impact if you’re trading an ETF or making regular contributions because you’ll need to cross the spread more often to get invested.

VAS and A200 have the lowest slippage at 0.03% followed by STW and IOZ at 0.04%. MVW has the highest slippage at 0.06%.

By comparison the average Australian Equity managed fund offered on the ASX mFunds platform charges a bid/ask spread of 0.55% – more than 27 times more than VAS and A200!

Liquidity

ASX codeETF nameDaily Transacted Value ($m)
STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF$17.2m
VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF$69.8m
IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF$30.8m
MVWVanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF$4.8m
A200Betashares Australia 200 ETF$24.0m
Data as at 31 March 2025. Source: ASX

Liquidity refers to the amount of turnover (or available turnover) in an ETF and it is measured by average daily volume on the ASX.

Volume is a measure of market making activity and trading interest which makes it a reasonable estimate of liquidity.

It’s worth mentioning that it may not reflect liquidity in the underlying stocks which is typically much deeper for broad Australian share ETFs.

However in times of crisis investors may not be able to rely exclusively on market makers for liquidity so daily volume is a relevant figure.

VAS has the highest liquidity in the category, with almost $70 million being traded per day. IOZ is the second highest at over $30 million while A200 follows behind at $24 million.

MVW has a daily traded volume of $4.8 million, which is the lowest volume of those compared. MVW is slowly increasing in trading volume but it is still considerably smaller than its peers.

Returns

ASX codeETF name5 Year Total Return p.a.
STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF14.3%
VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF14.6%
IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF14.5%
MVWVanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF14.9%
A200Betashares Australia 200 ETF15.9%
Data as at 31 March 2025. Source: ASX

The Australian share ETFs all generated similar returns over the last 5 years with IOZ, STW, VAS, A200 and MVW all returning around 14.3% and 15.2% p.a.

A200 outperformed its peers by generating a 5 year return of 15.2% while STW underperformed comparatively, generating 14.3%.

STW, VAS, IOZ and A200 are market-size weighted indices, MVW is an equal-weight index. This leads MVW to take weight out of the largest 10-15 shares and spread it across smaller companies.

The performance of these smaller shares relative to the largest companies is a key driver of differences between MVW and market-size based ETFs. Returns as at 31 March 2025 saw MVW as the second best performing ETF, but its performance is likely more volatile than its peers given its weighting strategy.

The longer the track record of an ETF and the index it mirrors, the better understanding you have of how an index reacts to different market conditions as well as how closely the ETF is tracking its index.

Most of the broad Australian share indices like the S&P/ASX 200 and S&P/ASX 300 have existed for some time, so you can see how they performed through boom times like 2003-2007 as well as periods of market stress like 2008.

Also important is the ‘tracking error’ which measures how well an ETF has done at mirroring its index. Tracking error is rarely zero because there are various factors that prevent an ETF from perfectly mirroring its index including fees.

ASX codeETF nameIndex history
STWSPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF24 years
Inception: 3 April 3, 2000
VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF24 years
Inception: 3 April 2000
IOZiShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF24 years
Inception: 3 April 2000
MVWVanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF21 years
Inception: 29 November 2013
A200Betashares Australia 200 ETF13 years
Inception: 17 September 2010

Stockspot’s verdict

Since 2014, we’ve invested on behalf of our clients into the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS).

What we originally liked about this fund was its low costs, as well as Vanguard’s consistent track record of lowering its fees – not just in response to competitors, but simply because it can.

We continue to favour VAS for a few reasons:

  • VAS’ low expense ratio (0.07% p.a.) and global track record of reducing costs. By comparison, the largest Australian share ETF (STW) waited 7 years before it lowered its costs from 0.29% to 0.19% in December 2015 and then another 5 years to reduce to 0.13%. It is not surprising that VAS overtook STW in July 2019 as the largest Australian share ETF.
  • VAS’ broader ASX 300 exposure compared to STW and IOZ which track the ASX 200
  • VAS’ large size ($18.2 billion) and liquidity ($69.8 million per day)
  • VAS’ low tracking error and slippage
  • VAS’ consistent return history and the 24 year track record of the S&P/ASX 300 index 

While MVW can go through some periods of good relative performance, we aren’t compelled by the equal-weight strategy or other non-market cap weighted strategies for reasons we explained in our article ‘Should you buy into smart beta ETFs?‘.

For clients who want more exposure to smaller shares, we recommend adding a pure small cap tilt using the Vanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF (VSO) as a Stockspot Theme

The VSO fund charges 0.30% p.a. and returned 14.6% p.a. over the 5 years to 31 March 2025, slightly underperforming MVW.

We continue to be confident in recommending VAS to our clients due to its size, commercial viability, liquidity and track record.

As a final note, it’s great to see the original Australian share ETF (STW) as well as global ETF giants (VAS and IOZ), different index strategies (MVW) and local disruptors (A200) all have broad Australian share ETFs available.

The Australian ETF ecosystem continues to grow at a rapid pace which is fantastic news for investors.

With the ETF market changing regularly, it’s hard to know which ETFs should be in your diversified portfolio. Stockspot has over 10 years experience in building and managing your share market portfolio for you.

Leave the tough decisions on which shares to buy this year up to us, so you can get on with enjoying life and not having to worry about picking stocks. Find out more about what’s in our portfolios or take our quiz and see which portfolio we’d recommend for your risk tolerance and investment timeframe. 

Learn how we help Australians grow their wealth with hands-off investing  
  • Chris Brycki

    Founder and CEO

    Chris has over 25 years of investment experience and spent most of his early career as a Portfolio Manager at UBS. Chris has been a member of the ASIC Digital Advisory Committee and volunteers as a member of the Investment Committee for the NSW Cancer Council. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting/Finance Co-op Scholarship) from UNSW.


Founder and CEO

Chris has over 25 years of investment experience and spent most of his early career as a Portfolio Manager at UBS. Chris has been a member of the ASIC Digital Advisory Committee and volunteers as a member of the Investment Committee for the NSW Cancer Council. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting/Finance Co-op Scholarship) from UNSW.

Grow your wealth effortlessly

Get your free personalised portfolio recommendation

Get started
cloud
Join thousands of Australian already investing with Stockspot