If you’re looking for the best Australian share ETF in 2026, you’re likely comparing VAS, A200, IOZ or STW. While these ETFs all track the Australian share market, there are important differences in fees, liquidity, size, index methodology and long-term performance.
Australian share ETFs remain one of the most popular ways to invest, thanks to their low costs, broad diversification and tax efficiency.
We’ve compared Australia’s five largest Australian share ETFs across six objective criteria to help investors choose the most suitable ETF.
Best Australian share ETFs: at a glance
| Investors wanting | ETF ticker code |
| Stockspots verdict: best overall | VAS |
| Lowest management fee | A200 |
| Largest ETF (by FUM) | VAS |
| Highest liquidity | VAS |
| Equal-weighted strategy | MVW |
While all five ETFs provide low-cost exposure to Australian shares, we continue to favour VAS due to its combination of scale, liquidity, diversification, commercial sustainability and long-term track record.
We review the top 5 Australian share ETFs and rank them based on:
ETFs are designed to track a market index rather than relying on active stock picking. As a result, they typically offer lower management fees than traditional active funds. They also provide transparency and can be more tax-efficient, with investors benefiting directly from capital gains, dividends, and franking credits generated by the underlying shares.
See our ETF Performance Comparison Tables to see all categories.
Size
| ASX code | ETF name | Size ($B)* | Growth Q4 2025 to Q1 2026 ($M) |
| STW | SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 6.5 | +326 |
| VAS | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF | 25.4 | +2066 |
| IOZ | iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 9.0 | +765 |
| MVW | VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF | 3.3 | +197 |
| A200 | Betashares Australia 200 ETF | 10.1 | +907 |
VAS has strengthened its position as Australia’s largest Australian share ETF, now managing $25.4 billion in assets. A200 has passed an important milestone, becoming only the second Australian share ETF of those compared to exceed $10 billion in assets under management. This highlights the continued popularity of low-cost index investing among Australian investors. IOZ has also continued to grow steadily, managing just over $9 billion.
MVW remains considerably smaller than the traditional market-cap weighted ETFs, although it returned to modest asset growth during the quarter, increasing funds under management to $3.3 billion.
The continued growth across the category highlights the increasing popularity of low-cost index investing among Australian investors. Larger ETFs also benefit from stronger commercial sustainability, making them less likely to close or increase fees over time.
Broadly within the Australian shares ETFs compared, the funds grew by an average of 7.9% between Q1 2026 and Q2 2026 (according to ASX data as at 30 June 2026), a notable increase from the period prior (which saw growth rates of 1.4%).
As ETFs gather more assets, it becomes easier for them to cut their expense ratios (fees) to continue attracting more funds.
On the other hand, ETFs which haven’t achieved critical mass can be forced to shut down and return investor funds or increase their fees to cover their costs.
Costs
| ASX code | ETF name | MER (% p.a.) |
| STW | SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 0.05 |
| VAS | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF | 0.07 |
| IOZ | iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 0.05 |
| MVW | VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF | 0.35 |
| A200 | Betashares Australia 200 ETF | 0.04 |
ETF expense ratios are becoming more competitive in Australia with the fee war expected to continue.
These ETFs have been undercut by Betashares when they launched A200 at 0.07% p.a., which they then slashed to 0.04% in March 2023 to become the most competitively priced ETF.
This sent a strong signal from Betashares that it intends to compete with State Street, Vanguard and iShares in this category. Demonstrative of the price sensitivity, STW and IOZ have fees of 0.05%, while MVW remains uncompetitive with a fee of 0.35%.
VAS is the most profitable ETF, earning approximately $17.8 million in revenue per year given its large share of the Australian share ETF pie, more than enough to be sustainable.
On the other hand, the more recently launched, but second largest ETF, A200 is earning around $4 million p.a. in fees based on its $10.1 billion AUM, significantly less than MVW (with estimated $11.5 million p.a in revenue) which despite its smaller size generates the second largest annual earnings due to its higher management fee.
Read more here about how Stockspot takes the guesswork out of choosing ETFs and builds you a diversified portfolio online.
The 3 lowest cost ETFs are now within 0.01% p.a. of each other on fees, which is great news for investors, as costs are one of the only factors you can fully control when investing in Australian shares. The less you pay a fund, the more of the returns you keep in your pocket.
That said, costs have converged to the point where investors need to carefully consider other factors including the funds’ commercial viability, liquidity and track record.
Slippage
| ASX code | ETF name | % Spread |
| STW | SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 0.03 |
| VAS | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF | 0.02 |
| IOZ | iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 0.04 |
| MVW | VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF | 0.05 |
| A200 | Betashares Australia 200 ETF | 0.02 |
Slippage refers to how much you lose by crossing the spread when buying or selling an ETF. It’s calculated by the average percentage difference between the best buyer and seller during market hours.
It has more of an impact if you’re trading an ETF or making regular contributions because you’ll need to cross the spread more often to get invested.
VAS and A200 have the lowest slippage at 0.02% followed by STW at 0.03%. MVW has the highest slippage at 0.05%.
Liquidity
| ASX code | ETF name | Daily Transacted Value ($m) |
| STW | SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | $15.9m |
| VAS | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF | $106.8m |
| IOZ | iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF | $29.2m |
| MVW | VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF | $5.8m |
| A200 | Betashares Australia 200 ETF | $28.8m |
Liquidity refers to the amount of turnover (or available turnover) in an ETF and it is measured by average daily volume on the ASX.
Volume is a measure of market making activity and trading interest which makes it a reasonable estimate of liquidity.
It’s worth mentioning that it may not reflect liquidity in the underlying stocks which is typically much deeper for broad Australian share ETFs.
However in times of crisis investors may not be able to rely exclusively on market makers for liquidity so daily volume is a relevant figure.
VAS has the highest liquidity in the category, with $106.8 million being traded per day. IOZ is the second highest with almost $29.2 million while A200 follows closely behind at $28.8 million.
MVW has a daily traded volume of $5.8 million, which is the lowest volume of those compared.
Returns
| ASX code | ETF name | 5 Year Total Return p.a. |
| STW | SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 9.2% |
| VAS | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF | 8.9% |
| IOZ | iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 9.1% |
| MVW | VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF | 7.6% |
| A200 | Betashares Australia 200 ETF | 9.4% |
The Australian share ETFs all generated similar returns over the last 5 years with STW, VAS, IOZ AND A200 all returning between 8.9% and 9.4% p.a.
A200 and STW marginally outperformed IOZ, with returns of 9.4% and 9.2% respectively, while IOZ generated 5 year returns of 9.1% p.a. MVW underperformed comparatively, returning 7.6%, some 1.8% less p.a. over the 5 year period, than the best performing Australian share ETF A200.
STW, VAS, IOZ and A200 are market-size weighted indices, MVW is an equal-weight index. This leads MVW to take weight out of the largest 10-15 shares and spread it across smaller companies.
The performance of these smaller shares relative to the largest companies is a key driver of differences between MVW and market-size based ETFs. Returns for MVW at the close of Q1 2025 saw the ETF ranked as the second best performing Australian Share ETF, but data at the close of Q2 2026 saw MVW as the worst performing Australian Share ETF of those compared for the second consecutive quarter. This demonstrates how MVW’s performance is likely more volatile than its peers given its weighting strategy.
The longer the track record of an ETF and the index it mirrors, the better understanding you have of how an index reacts to different market conditions as well as how closely the ETF is tracking its index.
Most of the broad Australian share indices like the S&P/ASX 200 and S&P/ASX 300 have existed for some time, so you can see how they performed through boom times like 2003-2007 as well as periods of market stress like 2008.
Also important is the ‘tracking error’ which measures how well an ETF has done at mirroring its index. Tracking error is rarely zero because there are various factors that prevent an ETF from perfectly mirroring its index including fees.
| ASX code | ETF name | Index history |
| STW | SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 26 years Inception: 3 April 3, 2000 |
| VAS | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF | 26 years Inception: 3 April 2000 |
| IOZ | iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 26 years Inception: 3 April 2000 |
| MVW | VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF | 22 years Inception: 29 November 2013 |
| A200 | Betashares Australia 200 ETF | 15 years Inception: 17 September 2010 |
Stockspot’s verdict
Since 2014, we’ve invested on behalf of our clients into the Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS).
What we originally liked about this fund was its low costs, as well as Vanguard’s consistent track record of lowering its fees – not just in response to competitors, but simply because it can.
We continue to favour VAS for a few reasons:
- VAS’ low expense ratio (0.07% p.a.) and global track record of reducing costs. By comparison, STW waited 7 years before it lowered its costs from 0.29% to 0.19% in December 2015 and then another 5 years to reduce to 0.13%. It is not surprising that VAS overtook STW in July 2019 as the largest Australian share ETF.
- VAS’ broader ASX 300 exposure compared to STW and IOZ which track the ASX 200
- VAS’ large size ($25.4 billion) and liquidity ($106.8 million per day)
- VAS’ low tracking error and slippage
- VAS’ consistent return history and the 26 year track record of the S&P/ASX 300 index
While MVW can go through some periods of good relative performance, we aren’t compelled by the equal-weight strategy or other non-market cap weighted strategies for reasons we explained in our article ‘Should you buy into smart beta ETFs?‘.
For clients who want more exposure to smaller shares, we recommend adding a pure small cap tilt using the Vanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF (VSO) as a Stockspot Theme.
The VSO ETF charges 0.30% p.a. and returned 6.9% p.a. over the 5 years to 30 June 2026, underperforming MVW by 0.7% (for the second quarter, despite outperforming it in 2025).
We continue to be confident in recommending VAS to our clients due to its size, commercial viability, liquidity and track record.
As a final note, it’s great to see the original Australian share ETF (STW) as well as global ETF giants (VAS and IOZ), different index strategies (MVW) and local disruptors (A200) all have broad Australian share ETFs available.
The Australian ETF ecosystem continues to grow at a rapid pace which is fantastic news for investors.
With the ETF market changing regularly, it’s hard to know which ETFs should be in your diversified portfolio. Stockspot has over 10 years experience in building and managing your share market portfolio for you.
Choosing an ETF is only one part of building a successful investment portfolio. Diversification across Australian shares, international shares, bonds, gold and other asset classes matters just as much. Stockspot builds globally diversified ETF portfolios tailored to your goals and automatically manages them over time, so you don’t have to.
Find out more about what’s in our portfolios or take our quiz and see which portfolio we’d recommend for your risk tolerance and investment timeframe.
